“Too much pollution is concealed underground. In Israel, as in the rest of the world, there is widespread pollution resulting from the use of fuels and chemical pollutants. This is the same industry that for decades has been using natural resources that belong to the public as if they were its private property, without obeying regulations for the disposal of hazardous materials at licensed waste treatment sites.”

At the start of the conference, Israel Institute of Energy and Environment chairman Amir Makov said, “The cost of decontaminating soil will cost billions of shekels, which is an astronomic figure in terms of the Israeli economy. We need to decide whether the environmental benefits justify this financial burden. It is legitimate to ask whether it would be better to invest this money in the health system for those who need medications, instead of burying money underground.”

Erdan responded to these comments, saying, “I do not agree with the claim of the Institute and industrialists that the law is forcing them to take upon themselves an economic burden that doesn’t pay, and that the money should just be added to the medicine basket. I was taught that prevention is better than treatment after the fact. So instead of suggesting that the medicine basket be expanded, I suggest reducing the chance that we will need those drugs in the first place by decontaminating the soil. We prefer that fewer children be born with birth defects, and fewer people suffer from respiratory problems.”

Erdan continued, “Land is Israel’s most precious resource, and I am not referring to its economic value, because the economic price of land in Tel Aviv is completely different than prices in the periphery. The State of Israel, which covers 22,000 square kilometers, not including Judea and Samaria, is the smallest country in the western world. It is already the most densely populated western country in the OECD.

“We received a clear reminder of this in the summer, when the social protests began, and it is clear that when there is less land in supply, partly due to contamination, this affects how much land is available for sale. When supply increases, prices fall. The soil decontamination should be carried out for the sake of environmental justice as well as social justice. It shouldn’t be carried out only in Tel Aviv and central Israel, where real estate values make it more economically viable, but also in the periphery.”

Both organic (those that contain carbon) and inorganic (those that don’t) contaminants are important in soil. The most prominent chemical groups of organic contaminants are fuel hydrocarbons, polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), chlorinated aromatic compounds, detergents, and pesticides. Inorganic species include nitrates, phosphates, and heavy metals such as cadmium, chromium and lead; inorganic acids; and radionuclides (radioactive substances). Among the sources of these contaminants are agricultural runoffs, acidic precipitates, industrial waste materials, and radioactive fallout.

Soil pollution can lead to water pollution if toxic chemicals leach into groundwater, or if contaminated runoff reaches streams, lakes, or oceans. Soil also naturally contributes to air pollution by releasing volatile compounds into the atmosphere. Nitrogen escapes through ammonia volatilization and denitrification. The decomposition of organic materials in soil can release sulfur dioxide and other sulfur compounds, causing acid rain. Heavy metals and other potentially toxic elements are the most serious soil pollutants in sewage. Sewage sludge contains heavy metals and, if applied repeatedly or in large amounts, the treated soil may accumulate heavy metals and consequently become unable to even support plant life.

In addition, chemicals that are not water soluble contaminate plants that grow on polluted soils, and they also tend to accumulate increasingly toward the top of the food chain. The banning of the pesticide DDT in the United States resulted from its tendency to become more and more concentrated as it moved from soil to worms or fish, and then to birds and their eggs. This occurred as creatures higher on the food chain ingested animals that were already contaminated with the pesticide from eating plants and other lower animals. Lake Michigan, as an example, has 2 parts per trillion (ppt) of DDT in the water, 14 parts per billion (ppb) in the bottom mud, 410 ppb in amphipods (tiny water fleas and similar creatures), 3 to 6 parts per million (ppm) in fish such as coho salmon and lake trout, and as much as 99 ppm in herring gulls at the top of the food chain.

The ever-increasing pollution of the environment has been one of the greatest concerns for science and the general public in the last fifty years. The rapid industrialization of agriculture, expansion of the chemical industry, and the need to generate cheap forms of energy has caused the continuous release of man-made organic chemicals into natural ecosystems. Consequently, the atmosphere, bodies of water, and many soil environments have become polluted by a large variety of toxic compounds. Many of these compounds at high concentrations or following prolonged exposure have the potential to produce adverse effects in humans and other organisms: These include the danger of acute toxicity, mutagenesis (genetic changes), carcinogenesis, and teratogenesis (birth defects) for humans and other organisms. Some of these man-made toxic compounds are also resistant to physical, chemical, or biological degradation and thus represent an environmental burden of considerable magnitude.

Numerous attempts are being made to decontaminate polluted soils, including an array of both in situ (on-site, in the soil) and off-site (removal of contaminated soil for treatment) techniques. None of these is ideal for remediating contaminated soils, and often, more than one of the techniques may be necessary to optimize the cleanup effort.

The most common decontamination method for polluted soils is to remove the soil and deposit it in landfills or to incinerate it. These methods, however, often exchange one problem for another: landfilling merely confines the polluted soil while doing little to decontaminate it, and incineration removes toxic organic chemicals from the soil, but subsequently releases them into the air, in the process causing air pollution.

For the removal and recovery of heavy metals various soil washing techniques have been developed including physical methods, such as attrition scrubbing and wet-screening, and chemical methods consisting of treatments with organic and inorganic acids, bases, salts and chelating agents. For example, chemicals used to extract radionuclides and toxic metals include hydrochloric, nitric, phosphoric and citric acids, sodium carbonate and sodium hydroxide and the chelating agents EDTA and DTPA. The problem with these methods, however, is again that they generate secondary waste products that may require additional hazardous waste treatments.

In contrast to the previously described methods, in situ methods are used directly at the contamination site. In this case, soil does not need to be excavated, and therefore the chance of causing further environmental harm is minimized. In situ biodegradation involves the enhancement of naturally occurring microorganisms by artificially stimulating their numbers and activity. The microorganisms then assist in degrading the soil contaminants. A number of environmental, chemical, and management factors affect the biodegradation of soil pollutants, including moisture content, pH, temperature, the microbial community that is present, and the availability of nutrients. Biodegradation is facilitated by aerobic soil conditions and soil pH in the neutral range (between pH 5.5 to 8.0), with an optimum reading occurring at approximately pH 7, and a temperature in the range of 20 to 30°C. These physical parameters can be influenced, thereby promoting the microorganisms’ ability to degrade chemical contaminants. Of all the decontamination methods bioremediation appears to be the least damaging and most environmentally acceptable technique.